VOTW: Muppets' Bohemian Rhapsody
Sunday, November 29, 2009 at 02:35AM Hi-frickin'-larious. No need to say more.
Sunday, November 29, 2009 at 02:35AM Hi-frickin'-larious. No need to say more.
Thursday, September 3, 2009 at 02:04AM Just take a look at the poster for Bandslam and think about if that's a movie that I would ever want to see, let alone actually like. Done thinking? I imagine that it didn't take very long to come to the conclusion that this isn't the movie for me. It has kind of a High School Musical sort of feel to it, even discounting the stars. Which is entirely wrong. The marketing for the movie did it a complete disservice, taking a pretty smart teen comedy and making it look like utter drivel.
Will Burton (Gaelan Connell) is not exactly your normal teenager. He's never really fit in with the rest of his school. Maybe it has something to do with him being completely obsessed with music, to the point where he writes letters to David Bowie. So, unlike most teenagers, he's overjoyed to have his mom (Lisa Kudrow) get a new job, forcing them to move far away. It's the chance for Will to start a new life.
Sunday, June 28, 2009 at 01:28PM I still love this video, and it seems appropriate this week.
dance,
music,
video in
Video of the Week
Saturday, January 17, 2009 at 03:32AM
Director Davis Guggenheim (An Inconvenient Truth) says that the idea for It Might Get Loud came from when a financier came to him with the money to make a film about the electric guitar. Which is exactly what he delivered. For the film is as much about the instrument as it is about those who play it.
The film brings together three guitarists from different generations, Jimmy Page (Led Zeppelin), The Edge (U2), and Jack White (The White Stripes) to tell the stories of the guitars that got them started playing. In their first electric guitars you can really catch a glimpse into their personalities. Jimmy Page's Fender Stratocaster is hard rocking and classic. The Edge's Gibson Explorer has a futuristic high tech look, with a great sound. Jack White's old, beat up, Kay Hollowbody fits in perfectly with the sort of punk rock Luddite persona he's created. You couldn't find three more different approaches to the music if you tried.
The more the film gets into the backstories of the musicians, the more different they become. Page is all training and professional musicianship, working for years as a studio musician, he probably has far greater ability than either of the others, but is perfectly happy to play the role of elder statesman. Edge is technologically obsessed, constantly fiddling with effects and tuning. He's well spoken, and obviously comfortable relating his personal narrative, as befits the lead guitarist of what's probably the biggest band in the world. White is a mass of contradictions, seemingly against all technology, and yet modifying a guitar to include things like a built in microphone. He only allows glimpses behind the layers of public persona.
It Might Get Loudis an interesting portrait of three generations of guitarists, and the instruments they play, but it isn't a perfect film. Having three distinct storylines muddles the overall narrative at times. Some scenes seem to carry on for far too long, especially when it's just someone jamming on a guitar (interesting for a little while, but noodling around gets old fast). I enjoyed the experience, but it wasn't exactly groundbreaking.
Grade: B-
Saturday, December 13, 2008 at 10:26PM
High Fidelity:
Or, How I Lost My Girl, Lost My Mind, and Found Them Both Again
I was nervous about this film going in. Adapting anything is tricky, but adapting my favorite book is even worse. I'll have to say that I was pleasantly surprised. The film manages to capture both the tone and style of the book, without just being a direct copy. What changes were made, (like changing the setting to Chicago instead of London and the location of a few scenes) didn't have any negative impact on the story. Rob Gordon (instead of Fleming) is just as desperate, and messed up, while still being likable as he is in the book. He constantly speaks directly to the camera, often lifting entire sections of dialogue from the book. It really gives you an insight into his character. It isn't a perfect film, but it's highly enjoyable.
The scoring:
Writing:
The dialogue is quite good. It has a great sense of humor, while still being dramatic. The plot is simple, but effective. The characters aren't especially complex, other than Rob, but it's his story so that isn't a huge problem. 0.9/1
Directing:
The pacing is great, moving things along at the perfect pace. The visuals aren't exactly boring, but nothing special. I would say that it's a very solid, professional job that lets the material and actors take center stage. Nothing wrong with that. 0.8/1
Acting:
John Cusack is perfect for this part. He has the same sort of likable, yet kind of a jerk quality that Rob has in the book. I couldn't have cast it better if I tried. His performance is spot on. The casting of Iben Hjejle as Laura never seemed quite right. She's perfectly fine, but it didn't ever click with me. Todd Louiso (Dick) and Jack Black (Barry) are perfect in their small supporting roles. They just fit. The rest of the cast (Lisa Bonet, Joan Cusack, Catherine Zeta-Jones and Tim Robbins) have small, but important parts that are played to their fullest. It's a deep cast led by a great leading man. 0.85/1
Technical:
The design is great. Everything has that perfect lived in, used look that it should. The Chicago locations are different and fun. Certainly better than if it had been set in New York. Nothing special, but fine work all the same. 0.7/1
History:
Hasn't ever been a huge massive film. Didn't have a big impact historically. A cult favorite, that's well remembered all around. 0.45/1
Entertainment:
I was highly, highly entertained. It has massive amounts of rewatchabilty for me. The characters never fail to suck me in. Maybe I've just read the book too many times, but watching the film is like a trip down memory lane for me. But I think you'll enjoy it too. 0.9/1
Misc.:
0.2 for the soundtrack. It's freaking amazing. I'm playing it right this minute, and it's been in the rotation ever since the first time I heard it. 0.1 for Bruce Springsteen. Not in the book, but it fits just perfectly. 0.1 for Jack Black going all in for "Let's Get it On." I love the song, and the performance is great. 0.1 for the different scenarios for when Ray comes into the shop. Hilarious.
Overall: 5.1/6.8
I highly enjoy it, and I think you will too. Go out and see it.
chicago,
cusack,
high fidelity,
hornby,
jack black,
music,
review in
Movies
Monday, November 24, 2008 at 10:00AM Or, How I Learned to Stick it to the Man, Whoever (S)he Is
Dewey Finn is the part that Jack Black was born to play. It plays to all his strengths; manic energy, kind of a slacker, some musical talent and relates well with kids. Which makes School of Rocksort of a love it or hate it endeavor. If you like Jack Black, which I generally do, you'll really like this. If you don't like him, then you'll probably hate it. I find it to a be a likeable, fun flick with a great cast of kid actors and a pretty dang good soundtrack. It may be completely ridiculous, and not particularly smart but I always find myself enjoying it. Maybe because deep down inside (or not so deep down) I want to be sticking it to the man.
The scoring:
Writing:
I'm a fan of Mike White, back from his days on Freaks and Geeks all the way through Orange Countyand up to this film. This has his usual flair for funny, off the wall characters and dialogue. There isn't really a lot of depth to the characters, or the plot, but it's fairly solid. 0.8/1
Directing:
This kind of slacker/burn out character driven film is right in Richard Linklater's wheelhouse. He's a capable director that has an unspectacular, but good visual style and a good sense of comedic pacing. Good work. 0.75/1
Acting:
Jack Black is very good in a role that really doesn't have much degree of difficulty for him. But he plays well off the child actors, most of which have no other experience. It's never easy to work with a cast of complete neophytes, so big props on that. Mike White and Sarah Silverman do stand up jobs as basically Black's straight men. Joan Cusack is her normal neurotic self. 0.8/1
Technical:
The production design is very good, in both the prep school and the rock worlds. Things felt at least somewhat authentic. Which is a big plus. Otherwise, just a solid family comedy. 0.65/1
History:
Was a big hit, and has developed something of a following. But it isn't exactly a classic. 0.4/1
Entertainment:
I find it to be highly entertaining. Light, fun and energetic with a decent cast, good dialogue and good soundtrack. Nothing to complain about there. Not something that will really stick with you though. Pretty much, you enjoy while you watch, but forget about it soon afterward. 0.85/1
Misc.:
0.2 for the music. Both the originals and the pre-recorded stuff. Very entertaining, one of the best parts of the film. 0.1 for the rock flow chart on the board. Fun and educational. 0.1 for "the Man" speech. Classic. 0.1 for the handshake. Overcomplicated that.
Overall: 4.75/6.8
Lots of fun, I always enjoy it and recommend it with no reservations.
jack black,
music,
review in
Movies
Saturday, August 30, 2008 at 10:58AM Joe Strummer: The Future is Unwritten:
Exploring the life of one of the seminal figures in the punk movement, The Future is Unwritten, lets us see what led Joe Strummer to be who he was. It takes a musical journey from his early work with the 101'ers to the formation and disintegration of the Clash and his late work with the Mescaleros. The film uses excerpts from Strummer's London Calling radio shows to frame the archival and interview footage. It's an interesting device that often time ties together disperate elements, keeping the film a bit more cohesive. I'd still say that some of the early parts of the film are a bit scattered and hard to follow, but it improved greatly afterward. I'd have to say that it was an interesting and informative film that I quite enjoyed.
The scoring:
Writing:
The structure can at times be a little scattered. Some of the interviews get all kinds of off topic, but it's overall fairly well done. 0.75/1
Directing:
The film is a bit too long, which slows down the pacing in places. I found it got a little bogged down in Strummer's adolescent years. There's an interesting visual style, that has good energy even in the static shots. 0.8/1
Acting:
The interviews are quite good on the whole. I did get a little annoyed that the film didn't indentify any of the people it interviewed. Some were obvious (like Johnny Depp, John Cusack, Martin Scorsese, Steve Buscemi and Bono) but others were more obscure, and I'd like to have known who they were. Good stuff here though. 0.8/1
Technical:
It looks fantastic for a documentary. There's a real sense of style. The archival footage is interesting and sometimes unexpected. I particularly enjoyed the sections where they animated some of Strummer's cartoons. 0.75/1
History:
An attempt to sum of a huge figure in the music world. The film itself didn't make much of an impact, but the subject matter sure did. 0.4/1
Entertainment:
I found myself very entertained. This is my favorite kind of music and I greatly enjoyed hearing about what went into it. But it'd probably be less entertaining for non fans. 0.8/1
Misc.:
0.2 for the soundtrack. It's completely fantastic, including alternate takes on some Clash songs, solo work and stuff with the Mescaleros. Plus songs that he played on his radio show. I actually picked up the soundtrack long before seeing the film and it's been in heavy rotation ever since. 0.1 for the animated cartoons. Highly enjoyed them. 0.1 for the clips from South Park and Animal Farm. Nice.
Overall: 4.7/6.8
It's a good flick. I highly recommend it to anyone who enjoys the music.
Wednesday, August 13, 2008 at 09:01AM
A documentary about my favorite band:
End of the Century: The Story of the Ramones:
I love the Ramones. There's nothing like them (though many have tried). If I only had to choose one band as my favorite, it'd have to be them. Their music is just plain fun. Loud, fast and simple. What's better than that?
So I was understandably excited for to watch a documentary that went more into detail about the band. To find out more of the true story of the changing lineup: Joey(vocals) and Johnny (guitar) always, Dee Dee (bass) mostly. Then Tommy, Marky, Richie, Elvis, and finally Marky again on drums. And C.J. in on bass at the end. All kinds of interesting stories with this band.
The scoring:
Writing:
They ask interesting and insightful questions of the interview subjects. There's an interesting, coherent structure. 0.8/1
Directing:
It's well paced. Maybe getting a little bogged down in certain subjects for too long. The visual style is simple, but energetic. 0.75/1
Acting:
All of the interview subjects are entertaining, interesting people. The members of the band, other people in the punk scene, and everyone else. 0.8/1
Technical:
It's all a fairly low tech business, documentary making. This isn't any different. It's solid, but not fantastic. 0.65/1
History:
It documents the story of one of the most influential musical groups of all time. The film itself doesn't have a ton of historical value, but the subject matter does. 0.6/1
Entertainment:
I was enthralled with it. But I'm a huge fan. It would still be interesting, but probably not to the same level. 0.85/1
Misc.:
0.1 for Dee Dee Ramone's rap album. Very hilarious. 0.2 for the music. The whole flick was full of it, and it was fantastic. 0.1 for some of the old footage. Amazing to see.
Overall: 4.85/6.8
It was a solid documentary in general, and a fabulous one for the fans.
Wednesday, June 4, 2008 at 10:54AM Teens journey to get some tickets:
This is not a smart, classy, thought provoking or really a good movie. But it is pretty entertaining in a stupid kind of way. It goes for the easy laughs and most of the time delivers. I don't know why I enjoy it, but I do. I guess there's something appealing about a group of slackers who're willing to do anything to get into the concert of their favorite band, KISS. It's just plain fun.
The scoring:
Writing:
The characters are pretty much two dimensional. The plot is inconsistent and far fetched. The dialogue isn't great. But there are some pretty funny scenes and jokes. 0.6/1
Directing:
The pacing is actually pretty good. Which is vital for a comedy. There really isn't much to the visual style, it isn't too ambitious. 0.65/1
Acting:
The acting in the film isn't exactly top rate. But it doesn't really need to be. The cast is really just a bunch of no names. And they're ok, just not great. 0.6/1
Technical:
The period setting looks pretty good. The design is decent. Nothing too spectacular though. Just kind of average. 0.55/1
History:
Other than the association with KISS, pretty much none. 0.25/1
Entertainment:
There are some laugh out loud scenes. And also some clunkers. But more funny than not. 0.7/1
Misc.:
0.1 for the "amateur contest." Pretty funny. 0.1 for Stretch Armstrong robbery. 0.1 for Joe Flaherty's scene. I always like him.
Overall: 3.65/6.8
It isn't great, but it makes me laugh.
Wednesday, May 28, 2008 at 11:15AM Weezer's new album comes out on Tuesday. I've always been a fan of the band. Their recent stuff hasn't been as good, but I completely love the Pinkerton album. So hopefully the new one is more like that. Here's the video for their new single: