Powered by Squarespace
    Contact Me
    This form does not yet contain any fields.
      Script Frenzy

      Entries in comics (26)

      Friday
      Jun262009

      X-Men: Origins- Wolverine (XBox 360)

      It's safe to say that I wasn't the biggest fan of the Wolverine movie, but after hearing a ton of good word of mouth about the video game based on it I decided to give it a shot.  I'm very glad that I did, the game is just a good time.

      Following the same basic storyline as the film, you play as Wolverine in two different time periods, during a mission in Africa as part of a US military team, and immediately following the Weapon X experiments in Canada.  You meet, and fight other mutants like other mutants, including the Blob, and Gambit along with the usual soldiers, robots and creatures.

      This game isn't really anything new, it's just a basic third person hack and slash game, but it does let you experience what being Wolverine really should be like.  He takes a ton of damage, and just keeps going.  The best part of which is actually seeing the damage inflicted on your character.  You show the wounds you take, and they heal slowly over time.  It's the first time I remember ever seeing Wolverine's healing factor portrayed like this in a game.  It's greatly appreciated.

      Wolverine is not a game for children.  Above and beyond seeing Wolverine's wounds, it's a gory game in general.  You don't just kill your enemies, you tear them apart, leaving little bits of them everywhere.  It's far too violent, and gory for children, definitely earning its M rating.  But that's part of the fun.  It's just a bloody good time.

      Saturday
      May022009

      Wolverine

      X-Men Origins: Wolverine

      To say that the production of Wolverine has been something of a disaster would not do it justice.  It's been through rewrites, reshoots and a multitude of edits, only to see a workprint leaked online weeks before the film's actual release.  So it really isn't much of a surprise that the film is a mess.

      Our story begins in 1840s Canada when the young James Howlett (later Logan/Wolverine) erupts in a fit of violence upon the death of his father, forcing him to run away with his half brother Victor. 

      They, being indestructible mutants, spend the next 120 years or so fighting in every American war from the Civil War to Vietnam.  James (Hugh Jackman) fights to protect others, while Victor (Liev Schreiber) enjoys every minute of it.  He's basically an animal, always giving in to his worst impulses.  Which is all hunky dory until they kill a superior officer during Vietnam and sentenced to death.  Only it's pretty hard to kill someone who's indestructible. 

      So Major William Stryker (Danny Huston) recruits the brothers into a special team of mutants that he leads.  This team carries out secret missions around the world to protect the U.S. and its interests, by any means necessary.  Which, oddly enough, doesn't square too well with James, so he leaves them all behind, including his brother.

      But, as with most things in movies, you can't leave the past behind forever.  It comes back into his life with a vengeance, taking away the woman he loved (Lynn Collins) in the process.  So he has to fight with, and against a host of other mutants, including John Wraith (Will.i.Am), The Blob (Kevin Durand), Bolt (Dominic Monaghan), Gambit (Taylor Kitsch), Agent Zero (Daniel Henney), and Deadpool (Ryan Reynolds) to avenge his lost love, and try to live his own life.

      Telling Logan's backstory, and how he became the Wolverine we know and love shouldn't be the hardest task in the world.  He has a well defined character, and personality with a wealth of backstory going back decades in the comics.  Most of which is either ignored, or jumbled together into some amalgam for the film.

      The Wolverine we see in this film is much closer in character to the one we see at the end of X-men 3: The Last Stand than it is to the angry, bitter, loner that came before he met Professor X.  His characterization is just not right.  The entire purpose of a Wolverine origin film (which I'm not sure is even a good idea in the first place) is  to show him at his most desperate and angry.  I'd have liked to see him actually confronted with a moral decision, and making a mistake once in a while.

      At the beginning of the film you can see the potential for this type of story in the Wolverine(Logan)/Sabretooth(Victor) relationship.  Victor has always been like the dark aspect of Logan's own personality.  He embraces all the rage and animalistic tendencies that Logan tries to overcome.  In the opening sequence showing Logan and Victor through the years you get a glimpse of both their closeness, and the differences that would eventually pull them apart.  The film should really be focused on this dynamic, and on these characters.

      Instead what we got was an almost disconnected series of events that does more to set up future films, than it does to tell a coherent, interesting story.  We get moments for Deadpool, Gambit, and even a host of young mutants that will go on to be X-men.  Which is fine, as far as these things go, but doesn't really help this film much.  I'd love to see the proposed Deadpool spinoff (maybe a little less now than I would have, after seeing how they treat the character in this film), or Wolverine in Japan (the supposed followup to this) or possibly even X-men: First Class (the young mutants at school), but I don't see why they had to set all of them up here, and ruin this film.

      Most of the performances are fine, but they don't exactly have much to work with.  Jackman could play this character in his sleep, Kitsch's Cajun accent is terrible, but with some work I could see him making an adequate Gambit, and casting Reynolds as Deadpool was an inspired choice.  I'd like to have seen more of Liev Schreiber, but they just didn't give him enough screen time to really develop the character.

      Wolverine is just a big, dumb, action movie.  Somewhat entertaining, without much intelligence, and pretty terrible writing (amnesia bullets- WTF?).  It'd be nice if the effects were better, instead of just looking cheap quite a bit of the time, but they're serviceable.  I can't really recommend it, but if you go into it with low expectations you'll probably find it mildly entertaining.  It's more on the X-men 3 level than it is close to the first two films in the X-men series.

      Grade: C-

      Friday
      Mar272009

      Watchmen: Tales of the Black Freighter

      Watchmen: Tales of the Black Freighter

      Within the Watchmen graphic novel there is just way too much information to fit into a film.  So some things had to be cut back.  The easiest things to cut have always been Tales of the Black Freighter, the comic within the comic, and Under the Hood, Hollis Mason's (the original Nite Owl) autobiography.  They don't directly relate to the main storyline, but inform on it, expand the world and give background information on it.

      What's amazing is that in the course of the production of the Watchmenfilm is that Zach Snyder was able to convince the studio to fund the making of both and animated Tales of the Black Freighter and a faux documentary based on Under the Hood, both included on a DVD released this week.

      Tales of the Black Freightertells the tale of a mariner (voiced by Gerard Butler) who's ship was attacked and destroyed by the ghostly pirates on board the Black Freighter.  All the rest of the crew was killed during the attack.  He'll do anything to get back to his home, and his family.  It's violent, grisly and disgusting at times.

      I was never the biggest fan of the black freighter sections of the graphic novel, but I think that this film more than does them justice.  The animation is quite good.  The extremely dark tone and tension is spot on.  I appreciate the story more in this context, and am intrigued to see how sections of it are incorporated into Snyder's director's cut of Watchmen.

      But, in my opinion, the best thing about the DVD is Under the Hood.  It takes the form of a 1975 television program that looks into Hollis Mason's book, and interviews some of the major characters.  We get to see the beginnings of the costumed heroes, Mason's start as Nite Owl and the formation of the Minutemen.  Seeing the young Nite Owl, Silk Spectre and Comedian is quite a treat.  It really brings some depth to the world.  We even get to see more from minor characters in the film that have a larger part in the comics, like the newsstand owner and Rorschach's psychiatrist.

      If you're thinking about seeing Watchmen, or have already seen it, then you really should check out this DVD.  It will expand the world, give you insight into the characters, plus tell you a creepy pirate story.  It's a little pricy for the relatively small amount of content that's on the disk (which is really my only complaint), so rent it if you aren't a big fan already.

      Grade: B

      Sunday
      Sep212008

      Love Invincible

      I just finished reading Soon I Will Be Invincible by Austin Grossman. It's a novel that tells the story of a super villain (Dr. Impossible) who's languishing in jail after being foiled in his twelfth attempt at world domination, and the story of a young up and coming cyborg super hero (Fatale) who may just be in over her heard.

      It's a fantastically written book. It lets you in on a completely different side of the super powered life. Instead of just seeing the big moments, or the fights the book shows the quieter moments and inner thoughts of the characters. It's like being dropped right down in the middle of a world where super powers actually exist. For a comic book fan like myself, it's completely amazing, but I think that anyone could appreciate the book on a character/story level.

      The only problem is that I think it's increasing my identification with the super villains even more. I couldn't really see myself in any of the heroes in the book, but shared a ton with Dr. Impossible. Which probably isn't a good thing, seeing how much frustration he has. Oh well, guess I'm just one step closer to villainy. Better work on my evil laugh.

      Saturday
      Sep132008

      Rise Above

      Based on a recommendation from one of the guys on the GeeksOn podcast I recently picked up the graphic novel Ascend. What intrigued me (aside from the recommendation) was that the book sounded very much like an odd dream I had involving an angel.

      Ascend tells the story of two brothers (Sebastian and Gabriel) and a sister (Seraphine) who die, ascend, and join the army of angels. This army has been involved in a war with the underworld for an eternity. They're losing the war so Gabriel decides to start killing humans to add them to the ranks of angels. Which is something of a problem, not so much being allowed. This gets the siblings banished back to earth, forced to live among humanity. Which they all do in a different way. It's all very mythos heavy, and kind of confusing at times.

      I can't say that it's a great book. The artwork is amazing, with a look that seems like a combination of great painting and Photoshop. I was very impressed with the art, but the story can be a little confusing (and the dialogue painful). Not having any speech bubbles makes things extra hard to follow. So I'd give in a A for the art and a C- for everything else. Makes it a solid read, but not fantastic.

      Wednesday
      Sep102008

      Vindicated

      A second go round from the web head:

      Spider-man 2:

      Now that all the exposition and origin story stuff was out of the way, the Spider-man franchise got down to telling a real story in this film. It's an amazing piece of work, probably the best superhero film ever made up until this summer. There's some great character development for Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire), Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst) and Harry Osborn (James Franco). But the villain is what really makes this film an improvement over the first. Otto Octavius/Doc. Ock is a complex person with real emotions and motivations that's wonderfully played by Alfred Molina. His addition to the film adds a real weight and depth, elevating it above the normal action film level. It's very good work all around.

      The scoring:

      Writing:
      The characterizations are fairly deep. The dialogue can at times still be a little corny, but it's definitely improved from the first film. The story isn't overly complex, but has enough depth to make it interesting. 0.8/1

      Directing:
      The pacing is spot on, building up to the climax of the film. There are some interesting visuals. Sam Raimi is really comfortable with the world he's working in at this point. 0.8/1

      Acting:
      Tobey Maguire hits the drama, action and comedy at all the right times. Kirsten Dunst is better here than she is in either of the other Spider-man films. Which isn't really saying much, but at least it's improvement. James Franco is good, but not great. Alfred Molina does great work as the villain, mostly resisting the urge to go completely over the top. 0.8/1

      Technical:
      The visual effects are improved from the first film. Everything looks less cartoony this time around. Which is a good thing. The design is still excellent. 0.85/1

      History:
      One of the highest grossing films ever. The best film in the franchise. 0.65/1

      Entertainment:
      It's very entertaining, with elements that almost everyone should enjoy. I've watched it many times and it never fails to deliver the entertainment value. 0.9/1

      Misc.:
      0.1 for Bruce Campbell yet again. He's always a highlight of the Spider-man films. 0.1 for the battle on top of the train. Very cool. 0.1 for the scene with Doc Ock in the hospital. Very reminicent of Raimi's horror films. 0.1 for the opening credits. With Alex Ross artwork! 0.1 for the elevator scene. Uncomfortably hilarious.

      Overall: 5.3/6.8

      It's a wonderful film, and highly entertaining.

      Tuesday
      Sep092008

      Learn to Crawl

      The film that really kicked off the current wave of comic book flicks:

      Spider-man:

      When this came out it was the best super hero film I'd ever seen. It respects the source material, portrays interesting characters and still manages to have some good action. This isn't to say that it isn't campy, because it definitely is, but it's well made and a lot of fun. Without someone bringing this level of storytelling and acting to the super hero genre we'd never have gotten to see later films (like the Dark Knight) that are amazing in their own right, and not just as super hero comic adaptations.

      The scoring:

      Writing:
      The dialogue can at times be pretty corny, especially for the Green Goblin, but it's not too bad most of the time. The plot is straighforward, but well thought out. The characters are well developed (well maybe not quite as much for Mary Jane, but that's ok), fully realized people. It deftly presents the orgin story of Spider-man, giving us a look not only into how he became a super hero, but also how he became the person he is. 0.7/1

      Directing:

      The pacing is a little slow in places, but overall it has a very good sense of pace. Sam Raimi's visual style is always good, he has a real feel for how to shoot action scenes while still being able to go for the comedy. 0.75/1


      Acting:
      Tobey Maguire does solid work as Peter Parker/Spider-man. He handles both sides of the part admirably. Willem Dafoe (Norman Osborn/Green Goblin) is chewing the scenery, but that's kind of what people hire him for. I'd have liked it to be a little more real, but it's not completely out of place. I'm just not a fan of Kirsten Dunst's acting, she isn't bad, but doesn't bring much to the table. James Franco doesn't have much to do, but he is good with what he does have. It's a solid cast. 0.75/1

       

      Technical:
      There are some very good visual effects, they aren't perfect, but still something special. The design is spot on, except for the Green Goblin, I just don't like his look. 0.8/1

      History:
      It kicked off one of the biggest film franchises ever, and helped to revive the super hero comic film. 0.7/1

      Entertainment:
      It's a fine, quite entertaining film. I wouldn't say that it's the greatest thing ever, but it held my attention for the entire running time, but some repeat viewings. 0.8/1

      Misc.:
      0.1 for casting J.K. Simmons as J. Jonah Jameson. It's just inspired. He's perfect for the part. 0.1 for Bruce Campbell. He has to be in all of Raimi's films and I just can't help chuckling when I see him. 0.1 for figuring out how to use the web slinging power. Hilarious. 0.1 for "with great power comes great resposibility," it's the iconic line. 0.05 for the people singing the Spider-man theme song. Funny stuff.

      Overall: 4.95/6.8

      It's a high quality fun time. I always enjoy it.

      Friday
      Aug222008

      Start the Apocalypse

      As I was reading the newest DMZ trade paperback, The Hidden War, (which is very good, but different from the rest of them in that it expands the world in short stories) I realized how much of a fascination with post disaster/post apocalyptic stories I have. There's just something about the complete breakdown of a civilization that sucks me right in. From the desolated, war torn New York of DMZ to the ashy wasteland of The Road, there's a quality, a desperation, to the stories that brings a reality to the characters that just isn't there in the everyday. What will people do to survive? What relationships will they form, or break? What type of civilization will rise out of the ruins?

      What makes these stories strike home even more is that they actually do happen. Disasters destroy local areas, civilizations like Rome crumbled, are conquered, or are devastated by disease. Yet there are always survivors left behind trying to make something new. There's a grain of hope within all the hopelessness. Children of Men has it's new birth that just might be a harbinger of things to come. Jericho has the people of the town, rebuilding a new America. Battlestar Galactica has the journey to Earth. Even something as dark and bleak as 28 Days Later has hope for a cure. Maybe it's this hope that makes the genre attractive.

      But I think when it really comes down to it the thing that really gets me interested is seeing the staying power of humanity. How we always survive, even if we have to remake everything. It's an admirable trait that can sometimes have horrifying consequences. And it somehow adds up to the genre that includes many of my favorite things. What are some of your favorite post apocalyptic tales?

      Thursday
      Jul312008

      Holding Out For a Hero

      Recently I decided to pick up the first couple trade paperbacks in Ed Brubaker's Captain America run (Winter Soldier: Vol 1 & Vol 2). Captain America was the hero in the very first comic I ever read, a free comic given to me at my doctor's office the day he told me I had asthma (Captain America: Return of the Asthma Monster). Yes, it's a comic where Cap battles allergens and a monster that gives people asthma. It's very corny, but also pretty cool to a kid that could be pretty scared. I mean if Steve Rogers (Cap's alter ego) had asthma, then what's wrong with it? Plus there's cool battles and stuff.

      So I've always had a squishy spot in my heart for Captain America. He's not always been the most complex of heroes. He's always does the right thing. No matter what. Even if it will hurt him in the end. He's just a plain noble hero type, and a good role model. But not necessarily the most interesting.

      I'll have to say that this run of the comics is very different. There is a character and relationship complexity to the world. People act like people. They fight and bicker. Things don't always work out. It's a much darker and harsher world that this version of Steve Rogers lives in. I've been very impressed. The series delves into his back story, letting the reader see sides of Cap that they've never seen before. He gets to face off against his classic nemisis, Red Skull, as well as a new threat, Winter Soldier. I can't wait to keep reading (Luckily this series ran a couple years ago so I don't have to wait to catch up). It's made me remember the enjoyment I used to get from the character as a kid.

      Sunday
      Jul202008

      Why So Serious?

      The best Batman film ever made:

      The Dark Knight:

      I really liked Batman Begins, but this is far and away a better film. We get to see even more of Batman's character. This is a challenge on a personal ethical level. It's an internal as well as an external threat. All of which is personified in the character of the Joker. Who, in my opinion, is the best of Batman's rogue's gallery. He's malevolent, funny, insane and horrifying. The perfect villain. It's a great film. Stands up there with the greatest of the super hero films, holding its own with legitimate crime thrillers.

      The scoring:

      Writing:
      The dialogue can still get pretty bad at times, but there are also places where it's quite good. The characterizations are spot on. I particularly appreciated that they never tried to explain the Joker. He's just who he is. How he got there isn't important. Well done. 0.8/1

      Directing:
      The film is quite long, possibly even a little bit too long. But the pacing is still pretty good. The action sequences are very well directed. They have a lot of energy, and you can actually tell what's going on. Good. 0.8/1

      Acting:
      Christian Bale does very solid work as Bruce Wayne/Baman. He can play the dramatic stuff just as well as the action. The veterans from the last film (Michael Caine, Morgan Freeman and Gary Oldman) all do very good work. Aaron Eckhart was an inspired casting choice, he's perfect for the role of Harvey Dent. Amazing stuff. Maggie Gyllenhaal is decent taking over the role of Rachel Dawes. Heath Ledger delivers the best performance in the film as the Joker. He hits all the right notes. It's a breathtaking performance, and will almost certainly get an Oscar nomination. 0.9/1

      Technical:
      It's a visually spetacular film, especially when seen in the IMAX format. The design is terrific. The makeup effects on both the Joker and Two face are pretty amazing. Great stunt work. 0.85/1

      History:
      The last film from Heath Ledger. One of the best super hero films ever. Possibly some awards. 0.7/1

      Entertainment:
      The only thing that takes away anything from my complete enjoyment of the film was the length. It was quite long, but still very, very entertaining. 0.9/1

      Misc.:
      0.1 for how the Joker always tells different versions of how he got his scars. A nice through line. 0.1 for the nurse's outfit. 0.1 for the Hong Kong sequence. 0.1 for the Chicago shooting. It really showed off the city. 0.1 for bringing back the Scarecrow in a cameo. It really helped connect the films. 0.1 for the introduction of the Joker.

      Overall: 5.55/6.8

      It's an amazing film. One that you absolutely must see.