Powered by Squarespace
    Contact Me
    This form does not yet contain any fields.
      Script Frenzy

      Entries in clooney (9)

      Tuesday
      Jan122010

      Alone in Airworld: I Wish I Was Up in the Air

      In director Jason Reitman's new film, Up in the Airthe character of Ryan Bingham (George Clooney) has embraced a lifestyle which minimizes any potential personal interaction. He spends over three hundred and twenty of the days each year away from "home," flying from place to place firing people. He spends his life in a world of airline seats, business hotels, and indistinct offices that the novel dubs, "'Airworld." He's perfectly content in Airworld, secure in the routine of travel, and the anonymity of crowds of strangers. His only goals are to reach an epic ten million frequent flyer miles (getting the perks that come with that milestone) and keeping his life in Airworld going as long as possible.

      Click to read more ...

      Tuesday
      Dec012009

      Fantastic Mr. Fox

      Fantastic Mr. Fox

      Wes Anderson has long been one of my favorite directors. Rushmore is one of my favorite films, and I honestly can't think of a single one of his films that I didn't at least moderately enjoy (yes, even Darjeeling Limited). That being said, I think that Fantastic Mr. Fox is his most accessible film, and may even be his best.

      Mr. Fox (voiced by George Clooney) put his days of poultry theft behind him when he settled down with his beloved wife (Meryl Streep) to raise a family. But familial bliss, and a career as a writer for the local newspaper isn't enough for him. Feeling unfulfilled, he packs up his wife and his strange, not particularly cool son Ash (Jason Schwartzman) and moves them out of their hole and into a bigger, and better, tree. The only problem is that this tree is in full view of the farms of Boggis, Bunce and Bean, the three meanest, most vicious farmers in the area. The temptation is too great for Mr. Fox and he soon goes back to his thieving ways, enlisting the help of his friend Kylie (Wally Wolodarsky) and his nephew Kristofferson (Eric Anderson) in a series of ever more difficult capers.

      Click to read more ...

      Tuesday
      Nov242009

      The Men Who Stare at Goats

      The Men Who Stare at Goats

      I really wanted to like The Men Who Stare at Goats. It has a couple of my favorite actors in it (George Clooney and Jeff Bridges) and I love a good story about secret government research, especially when they're researching turning soldiers into "Jedi warriors." It all sounds promising, and turns out to be disappointing.

      A strange series of events leads local reporter Bob Wilton (Ewan McGregor) from investigating a psychic in Michigan to trolling through Kuwait trying to find a story about the war in Iraq. A story he stumbles across, of Lyn Cassady (Clooney), a man trained as a psychic soldier (Jedi warrior) by the U.S. government during the 1980s. Lyn spins the tale of the founder of his unit, Bill Django (Bridges) and his wanderings through the America of the 1970s, trying to find the tools to create a new kind of soldier, a soldier that'd use peace to end war. Lost and confused, Bob follows Lyn into Iraq, on one last mission.

      Click to read more ...

      Tuesday
      Sep232008

      Let It Burn

      The latest from the Coen brothers:

      Burn After Reading:

      I love the Coen brothers' films. Even some of their lesser works (The Ladykillers, Intolerable Cruelty) are still highly enjoyable. Their best stuff (No Country for Old Men, The Big Lebowski) is just plain fantastic. So I was very excited to see this film, and have to say that I enjoyed it. It's certainly not at the same level as their best work, but is solidly in the middle of the pack. It has some of the same sort of feel as Fargo, but without being quite as good. Burn After Reading is the Coen's version of the espionage thriller, which is just highly amusing.

      The scoring:

      Writing:
      The characters are all fools, but they're interesting fools. The Coens have a knack for creating unique characters that are extremely flawed. The plot is at times confusingly complex. The dialogue is quite good. 0.8/1

      Directing:
      It's well paced, if a little jarringly structured. The visuals are very interesting. It shows their distinctive style (even though they had a new DP for this film). Solid work. 0.8/1

      Acting:
      It's an all star cast, that's for sure. George Clooney plays a complete buffoon. Which he's pretty good at. Frances McDormand is in her element. Great. Brad Pitt is a fool. Pure and simple. Which is a nice change of pace from what he's been doing lately. John Malkovich is crazy and intense. As per usual. Tilda Swinton is the ice queen. Which oddly enough she's played before. There's nothing groundbreaking here, but everyone does solidly professional work. 0.8/1

      Technical:
      It's a fairly low budget comedy that gets the most for it's money. The design is good, but there isn't anything super exciting about it. 0.7/1

      History:
      Made by one of the most well known writer/director teams, who are coming off a Best Picture win. 0.5/1

      Entertainment:
      There are laugh out loud moments. But the entire thing is more amusing than hilarious. It'll hold your attention though. 0.75/1

      Misc.:
      0.1 for Malkovich's, "You're Mormon! Everyone has a drinking problem compared to you!" 0.1 for all of J.K. Simmons' scenes. They were the funniest parts of the film for me. 0.1 for riding your bike to the blackmailing. 0.1 for the axe.

      Overall: 4.75/6.8

      Another solid effort from the Coens.

      Saturday
      Jun072008

      Section 11 (We Sound Amazed)

      A remake of a classic Frank Sinatra film:

      Ocean's Eleven:

      There isn't anything deep or touching about this film. It's straight entertainment. Just a bunch of A-list talent getting together for a fun time, and taking us along for the ride. Which is exactly what the old version of Ocean's Eleven did. Only this version is a lot more fun. Because while it's true that there's no one cooler than Sinatra, his movie was actually kind of boring. This is just a smart heist movie, with no pretensions at being anything else. Which just makes it more enjoyable.

      The scoring:

      Writing:
      The dialogue is quick and funny. The characters are pretty much one dimensional, but they don't need to be very deep for this story. Which is overly complicated and convoluted, but it doesn't seem to much matter. 0.75/1

      Directing:
      Steven Soderbergh is very capable of making a very good film (i.e. Traffic, Out of Sight). He has a good visual sense, and while his pacing can get a bit slow, it stays brisk here. He does very good work here. 0.75/1

      Acting:
      The cast is the cream of the crop, George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Matt Damon, Don Cheadle, Bernie Mac, Elliot Gould, Casey Affleck, Julia Roberts, Andy Garcia, it's an amazing collection of talent. And they all look like they're having a great time, even if they aren't exactly giving the performances of their career. 0.8/1

      Technical:
      It's flashy, but fairly low tech. There aren't many computer generated effects. Which is a nice change. Practical stuff up the wazoo though. 0.7/1

      History:
      A collection of huge stars remaking a Sinatra film. Spawned two sequels. 0.5/1

      Entertainment:
      It's fun, and quick. It keeps you very entertained. 0.85/1

      Misc.:
      0.1 for the Mormon twins. Gives me a chuckle. 0.1 for the celeb card game, and especially for Topher Grace's version of himself. Nice. 0.1 for the scene out at the Bellagio fountain. 0.1 for Basher.

      Overall: 4.75/6.8

      A good, entertaining flick. See it if you haven't already.

      Sunday
      Apr132008

      Change the Game

      The new George Clooney flick:

      Leatherheads:

      This may look like a sports film, but really it's trying to be a screwball comedy. It's like George Clooney was trying to make a film that wasn't only set during the twenties, but that could have been made during the twenties. The style just feels a little self conscious and dated. It seems like everyone is always mugging for the camera. There was a lot of potential here, but it wasn't realized.

      The scoring:

      Writing:
      It just feels a little too clever and old timey. Like the characters were doing rehearsed speeches instead of acting the way they really would. And that's beside the complete ridiculous of the plot. 0.6/1

      Directing:
      Clooney has a decent visual style, and sense of pacing. This was a little too slow for this type of comedy. 0.65/1

      Acting:
      The mugging for the camera got pretty old. And while Clooney, Renée Zellweger, and John Krasinski are all talented, there really wasn't that much chemistry between the romantic leads. There's some decent work here, but nothing great. 0.6/1

      Technical:
      The period details were well thought out and executed. Especially the costumes. The look of the film was excellent. 0.7/1

      History:
      I don't think this will have much of a lasting impact. 0.3/1

      Entertainment:
      There were some good jokes. Parts of the film were quite entertaining. But it dragged on in places. 0.7/1

      Misc.:
      0.1 for the piano player in the bar fight. 0.1 for Stephen Root, I'm a fan.

      Overall: 3.75/6.8

      It wasn't great by any stretch of the imagination, but I've seen worse.

      Sunday
      Feb242008

      Where There's Gold...

      Here's who I think will win, and who I think should win, in tonight's Academy Awards (Should win in bold, will win in italics):

      Best Supporting Actress:
      Cate Blanchett, "I'm Not There"
      Ruby Dee, "American Gangster"
      Saoirse Ronan, "Atonement"
      Amy Ryan, "Gone Baby Gone"
      Tilda Swinton, "Michael Clayton"

      I've seen all five of the films in this category. Based on that I'm immediately taking Ruby Dee (she was only on screen for like 10 minutes in American Gangster) and Saoirse Ronan (I didn't much care for Atonement, or her performance) out of the equation. Tilda Swinton was very good in Michael Clayton, but not quite up to the level of the other two performances. I think it really comes down to Cate Blanchett and Amy Ryan. Both of them were excellent, but if I had to choose one I'd pick Cate Blanchett. Her portrayal of Bob Dylan was the strongest part of I'm Not There. But I think Amy Ryan probably will win, because people nominated in two categories (like Blanchett) usually split their vote and don't win either.

      Best Supporting Actor:
      Casey Affleck, "The Assasination of Jesse James by the Coward..."
      Javier Bardem, "No Country For Old Men"
      Phillip Seymour Hoffman, "Charlie Wilson's War"
      Hal Holbrook, "Into the Wild"
      Tom Wilkinson, "Michael Clayton"

      Out of these films I've only seen No Country For Old Men and Michael Clayton, but I don't think it matters. Tom Wilkinson gives a wonderful performance and would probably win in most other years, but there's no chance that Javier Bardem isn't winning this year. His performance is amazing and terrifying. Genius work. There is not way he shouldn't win.

      Best Actress:
      Cate Blanchett, "Elizabeth: The Golden Age"
      Julie Christie, "Away From Her"
      Marion Cotillard, "La Vie En Rose"
      Laura Linney, "The Savages"
      Ellen Page, "Juno"

      I'm only one for five in this category (Juno), so I can't say much about it. As much as I'd like to see Ellen Page win it, I'm pretty sure her performance wasn't the best of the bunch, so I'll go with a lifetime achievement style award for Julie Christie.

      Best Actor:

      George Clooney, "Michael Clayton"
      Daniel Day-Lewis, "There Will Be Blood"
      Johnny Depp, "Sweeney Todd: The Demon Barber of Fleet Street"
      Tommy Lee Jones, "In the Valley of Elah"
      Viggo Mortensen, "Eastern Promises"

      Five for five here. All of them are very good performances. But one really stands out. Daniel Day-Lewis gives an amazing, transformative performance in There Will Be Blood. At times he's mesmerizing. The energy and brutality are transfixing. Best performance of the year, by far.

      Adapted Screenplay:

      Christopher Hampton, "Atonement"
      Sarah Polley, "Away From Her"
      Ronald Harwood, "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly"
      Joel Coen & Ethan Coen, "No Country for Old Men"
      Paul Thomas Anderson, "There Will Be Blood"

      My personal choice here would be the Coen Brothers for No Country for Old Men. The writing in the film is amazing. Character, structure and dialogue are all spot on. But this may be the category that the Academy decides to honor something smaller, like The Diving Bell and the Butterfly.

      Original Screenplay:

      Diablo Cody, "Juno"
      Nancy Oliver, "Lars and the Real Girl"
      Tony Gilroy, "Michael Clayton"
      Brad Bird, Jan Pinkava and Jim Capobianco, "Ratatouille"
      Tamara Jenkins, "The Savages"

      This is where Juno should win its award. The screenplay was pretty amazing. I'd give it to it hands down. But there seems to be a bit of anti-Juno backlash so I'm going to say that Tony Gilroy will win it for Michael Clayton.

      Best Director:

      Julian Schnabel, "The Diving Bell and the Butterfly"
      Jason Reitman, "Juno"
      Tony Gilroy, "Michael Clayton"
      Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, "No Country for Old Men"
      Paul Thomas Anderson, "There Will Be Blood"

      The Coen Brothers would be my choice here. Their work on No Country for Old Men was amazing. It's a very good list of nominnes top to bottom, so I wouldn't really be disappointed if any of them won though.

      Best Picture:
      Atonement
      Juno
      Michael Clayton
      No Country For Old Men
      There Will Be Blood

      Atonement has no chance. I wouldn't have even nominated it. Juno was my favorite movie out of this bunch, but not necessarily the best. I'd say that it comes down to No Country For Old Men and There Will Be Blood. Both good choices, but I'd choose No Country for Old Men. It was entertaining, beautiful and wonderfully made. Best picture of the year.

      And that's it for my Oscar picks. I'm not going to even try on the other categories. If you want to read full reviews of any of the films I've seen, click here for a full list.

      Wednesday
      Nov142007

      The Truth Can Be Adjusted

      George Clooney's latest flick.

      Michael Clayton:

      This film is pretty interesting. It examines the culture of corporate greed and dishonesty in America. I think that it belongs in a category with films like The Insider that show the inner working of corporations and the lengths to which they'll go to protect themselves.

      The scoring:

      Writing:
      The characters and dialogue are both very well written and conceived. The plot may be a little contrived and the structure is overdone to the point of some confusion. But overall, pretty well written. 0.85/1

      Directing:
      The pacing is good. It's solid if not spectacular work. Gets good performances out of his actors. 0.8/1

      Acting:
      Fine performances from top to bottom in this deep ensemble. Clooney is great in the lead role. Tom Wilkinson is fantastic. Tilda Swinton is very, very good. 0.85/1

      Technical:
      Well shot and staged. It's a film that doesn't bring anything to the forefront. Solidly done. 0.7/1

      History:
      Great performances may warrant awards consideration. A generally smart film with some staying power. 0.7/1

      Entertainment:
      There are a few places where the film doesn't grip you, but otherwise it is a pretty entertaining watch. 0.75/1

      Misc.:
      0.1 for Wilkinson's speech. Fantastic. 0.1 for Clooney throwing his watch in the burning car.

      Overall: 4.85/6.8

      Well made. A good watch. Well worth seeing.

      Sunday
      Jul012007

      No. 13 Baby

      The review of the third film in the new Ocean's series.

      Ocean's Thirteen:

      I liked this movie much more than Ocean's Twelve. Everything was much better. It wasn't a great movie. But it was good. The cast was very good and the locations in Las Vegas were fantastic. Not nearly as good as Ocean's Eleven, but still an enjoyable popcorn movie.

      The scoring:

      Writing:
      Not bad. Not great either. The dialogue was pretty good. The plot was completely ridiculous. 0.7/1

      Directing:
      Steven Soderbergh can be very inconsistent. Ranging from great (Traffic) and very good (Out of Sight) to horrible (Ocean's Twelve) and very boring (Solaris). This is on the side of good to very good. It has great pacing and he gets great work from his actors. 0.8/1

      Acting:
      Great cast. Lots of big names. But the supporting actors are the most fun. Casey Affleck, Scott Caan, Shaobo Qin, Elliot Gould, Eddie Jemison and Carl Reiner are all having a great time. 0.8/1

      Technical:
      Beautifully shot. The lighting is gorgeous. The production design is excellent. Solid. 0.75/1

      History:
      Lots of big name actors together. Not much else. 0.5/1

      Entertainment:
      Remains pretty entertaining all the way through. An enjoyable experience. 0.8/1

      Misc.:
      0.1 for "Peligroso es me nombre medio." Such a bad line, which makes it hilarious. 0.1 for the Zapatista revolution at the dice factory. 0.1 for no Julia Roberts or Catherine Zeta-Jones. They annoyed me in the last one.

      Overall: 4.65/6.8

      Not a great movie. But a good time if you're looking for mindless entertainment.